by ak mukherjee 2009 cited by 6 — mineral processing & extractive metall. separation efficiency of gravity separation processes. recovery of coal/value mineral in the clean coal/concentrate.
by a jowett 1985 cited by 14 — m. digreseparation factor analysis for mineral dressing processes. int. miner. process. a. jowettformulae for the technical efficiency of mineral separations.
by ma abd aziz 2017 cited by 3 — however, the separation efficiency may be influenced by the type of materials a, yan, d (2006) mineral processing design and operation: an introduction.
by ja finch 1989 cited by 17 — to mineral processing engineers through separability (e.g. grade- recovery) curves. perfect separator; grinding efficiency; polished section. introduction.
by a flow — separating sulfide minerals from silica gangue (and from other sulfide table 1: grade/recovery performance of a hypothetical copper ore flotation process. collection zone size, particle/bubble contact efficiency, and fines entrainment
the efficiency of this separation process is relatively low and is repeated a at one point, palabora mining co. in south africa used 68 reichert cones to treat
by a bahrami 2019 cited by 7 — also, the separation efficiency was mostly influenced by the concentrate this process is based on the wettability of copper mineral particles to
by aia salama 2001 cited by 6 — abstract. a universal separation efficiency (use) for evaluating the separation characteristics of multi-component, multi-product separation processes in mineral
from traditional and trusted magnetic separation equipment, right through to our sorting equipment or mineral processing equipment, specially developed for mining separators for traditional processing (de-stoning for greater efficiency).
data to assess separation efficiency in mineral processing some of liberation on the global separation process (sousa et al., 2018b) . .
by c da corte cited by 2 — the journal of the southern african institute of mining and metallurgy. volume 119 separator in a selective flocculation process, magnetic separation.
and jowett and sutherland (1985), as the basis for the definition of separation efficiency we take the - selection from wills' mineral processing technology,
separation. a. gupta, d.s. yan, in mineral processing design and operation, 2006 more than 5 of 45 m slimes will affect the separation efficiency.
by a ebtedaei 2020 cited by 1 — gravity separation of a low-grade lead and zinc carbonate ore (case study: angouran mine, mineral processing and extractive metallurgy review the separation efficiency (sharpness) and plant performance to separate
by c robben 2019 cited by 19 — separation process for coarser grain sizes before the application of fine which contribute to the overall separation efficiency of the equipment.
by m buchmann 2018 cited by 12 — a dry magnetic separation by a drum type magnetic separator served as a case study to visualize effects of processing of a skarn ore with a high
gravity concentration is the separation of minerals based upon the difference in density. mineral processing comprises many unit operations, such as gravity concentration, increasing the concentration criterion also increases efficiency.
by aia salama 2001 cited by 6 — the maximum universal separation efficiency attainable in the separation process data is designated as the universal separation index (usi). the proposed use
by r singh cited by 7 — of mineral values and the search for an economic process, it has been the major concern resulted in improvement in the separation efficiency. in the last four
by j chen 2017 cited by 3 — electrostatic separation is a dry mineral processing method that does not require any water tribocharging effect that reduces particle tribocharging efficiency.
physicochemical problems of mineral processing was adopted to improve the separation efficiency of galena flotation. the chemical composition of the fine-grained galena ore from fankou lead-zinc mine located in south.
by m irannajad cited by 1 — in mineral processing separation efficiency (se), operation efficiency (oe), selectivity index (si) and other indices have been used to evaluate the separation